![]() Notice is illegible or concealed from view.Notice does not include a named claimant or does not name the actual copyright holder.Notice is dated more than one year later than the actual date of first publication.Notice does not include the copyright symbol ©, the word "Copyright", or the abbreviation "Copr.". ![]() ![]() This work is in the public domain because it was published in the United States between 19, inclusive, with a defective copyright notice ( copyright notice information) containing at least one of the following defects: Note that the poster art is a distinct work from the film it represents and had to be renewed separately. Because it was not renewed, copyright lapsed at that time. In order to maintain copyright protection, the poster would have had to be renewed 28 years after publication, in either 1960 or 1961 (see the sections for "Artwork: Original registrations and renewals" and refer to the links to search the copyright catalogs for those years). Even if the notice were somehow deemed sufficient, the poster art was not renewed as required by American copyright law to extend/maintain protection for works published 1963 or earlier. If just one of these elements is omitted, the work is deemed to be published without notice and is not eligible for copyright protection. "The name of the copyright owner, or an abbreviation by which the name can be recognized, or a generally known alternative designation of the owner."."The year of first publication for the work" and."The symbol © or the word 'Copyright' or the abbreviation 'Copr.' or an acceptable variant such as "(c)".Keep in mind that the pre-1989 requirements for copyright notice were highly formalistic and, other than a few enumerated exceptions, required these three elements: While the mashing together of "Warner" and "Bros" is excusable, the omission of a year of publication is not. It carried a defective notice that omits the year: "Copyright - WarnerBros. Second, the poster was first published prior to 1978 without a valid copyright notice.First, the photo is a mechanical scan/photocopy of the original poster and does not qualify for independent copyright protection.If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. Image:Footlight.jpg is being used on this article.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |